The thing is, the officer who does the arresting has no way of know if you knew what was going on or not, it's not like you would tell the truth if you did, so you have to assume they knew the whole time. It's sad it has to be that way, but honesty is a rare thing these days, especially when you're faced with the possibility with jail time. Would you get jail for being an accessory? Probably not, unless its a murder charge, or a large scale drug thing, kidnapping, etc. The things you mentioned, they probably got fined and community service, which still sucks, but that's the rules.
What I'm saying is, in the article they site incidents like that being a common occurrence, which I don't believe. There are video camera everywhere, so maybe one in a thousand women are sexually assaulted, but not every woman is. The problem is there are more men who are guards then women, so they have to make do with what they have. I'm sure if they could get all women they would, but the reality is they just don't. Are there corrupt guards, of course, just like there are corrupt lawyers and teachers and everything else. It doesn't make it right, but not all are.
That's what bothered me with the article the most. Maybe one in ten thousand are there for poor or unfounded reasons, but they are not all there because the police are trying to punish their loved ones. That's all I'm saying about it, really. If they were discussing prison in Columbia I would have been, "oh yeah, well that's probably true," but reading that I was like, "bullshit, ten points from gryffindor!" haha, but seriously.

Annnyyywaaayyy so...I'm gonna be in Springtown this weekend most likely to see a boy...with blue eyes, I have been smiling non-stop all week. It only took me, what...4 years? Whatevs. I'm excited.
See you bitch.

-mb